A path with fourteen stations

The Spine

A path through what did not reach us

This is not a history lesson. If it were, you could read it once, know more than you did, and be finished. That is exactly the trap.

What follows are fourteen places where I had to change my mind. They are in the order I walked them, including the place where I doubled back and reversed myself — because I think the reversal is the most useful part.

You can open all of these in half an hour. I would rather you didn't. Each station ends with a question to sit with. Sitting with a question is not a delay before the work. In the Quaker manner, it is some of the work.

One caution before you start. I am a seventy-five-year-old white Quaker man, and this is my account of my own ignorance. The people who carried this knowledge the whole time, at great cost, did not need any of these stations explained to them. Nothing here is a discovery. It is a settler noticing, late.

0 of 14 opened

Movement I — The Absence

I graduated from Scattergood Friends School in 1970. I was taught personal integrity, community integrity, Quaker practice, critical thinking. I was not taught that Quakers ran Indian boarding schools. I was not taught whose land the school stood on.

It is ironic that Scattergood was established in 1890, at the very time Quakers were also establishing schools for Native children. Both were residential institutions built to shape young people. Mine was built to help me resist assimilation into the surrounding culture. Theirs was built to force assimilation into it.

I did not learn this until about 2017. I was in my mid-sixties.

The moveAsk the question about yourself before you ask it about anyone else.
The trapTreating your own late arrival as a personal failing. It is not primarily personal. It is a mechanism, and mechanisms can be described.
Sit with thisWhat is something you learned late that everyone around you also learned late? Who was in a position to have told you?

When I looked for a phrase, I considered “what was hidden from us.” I did not use it. I do not believe our teachers at Scattergood were instructed to withhold this history. I believe they did not know it themselves.

So I called the arc what did not reach us.

Hold onto that phrase. We are going to come back and take it apart at Station 12.

The moveName the absence, so it becomes a thing you can point at.
The trapFalling in love with the phrase. A phrase that comforts everyone who hears it is doing something other than telling the truth.
Sit with thisSay “this history did not reach us” out loud. Notice who, in that sentence, is being asked to do anything.

Think of knowledge as water moving through channels. Water does not reach where there are no channels — not because the water isn't there, but because the channel was never built.

The knowledge was never missing. Native people carried it the whole time. What was missing was any relationship by which it could reach me.

I now call such a relationship a channel: a connection strong enough to carry knowledge across a boundary.

The moveStop asking what you were taught. Start asking who you knew.
The trapDeciding that a book, a film, or a webpage is a channel. They open doors. They do not carry this.
Sit with thisName one person who has knowledge you do not have. Now ask honestly whether you have a relationship with them, or only access to them.

Movement II — The Mechanism

This throughline is unlike the others in my life. The others begin with something I received. This one begins with an absence — and an absence gives you no signal that it is there.

The only way to become aware of something you did not know you did not know is for someone who holds it to reveal it to you. Which requires a relationship. Which requires time.

Paying attention is not the same as understanding. And understanding is not the same as knowing what you do not know.

The moveAccept that you cannot audit your own ignorance from the inside.
The trapReading more. Research finds what is missing. It cannot find what you have no category for.
Sit with thisWhat would it take to find out what you don't know you don't know? Notice that the answer is a person, not a source.

How did people shaped by a testimony against violence come to run institutions that inflicted it — and then, for generations, not see that they had?

The answer is the story that made Friends proud: that we were the humane alternative to the Army's brutality and the corruption of the Indian agencies. That is why President Grant brought Quakers into federal Indian policy in what was called the Peace Policy, and sometimes the Quaker Policy. Under it, Friends administered Indian affairs across the Great Plains and operated more than thirty boarding schools.

A narrative of benevolence is an unusually effective concealing device precisely because it is sincere.

Soldiers who kill know themselves to be killing.

Teachers sincerely believed they were helping Native children adapt to the encroaching culture. And they could pass that belief on, undisturbed, to their descendants.

To me.

The moveLocate the concealment inside the good intention, not opposed to it.
The trapHearing this as an excuse. It is a description of a machine, offered so the machine can be shut off.
Sit with thisWhat does your community believe about its own goodness? What might that belief be keeping out of view?

Abstractions did not reach me either. A person did.

The West Branch Industrial School opened January 16, 1883, run by Benjamin and Elizabeth Miles, Quakers, who were paid $167 a year “for the keep of each Indian boy or girl sent to the school.”

Theodore Rogers, Osage, about eight years old, died there on June 15, 1883, of malaria fever, and was buried in an unmarked grave in the Friends' section of the West Branch Municipal Cemetery.

Grace Yellowhair, Arapaho, arrived in mid-March 1883. She was fifteen. She died on September 11, 1883, and was buried next to Theodore. Her grave, likewise, remained unmarked.

West Branch is two miles from Scattergood, where I went to school. Her story did not reach me until 2024 — a hundred and forty-one years — when Judy Cottingham of the West Branch meeting came across a research paper by Peter Hoehnle, a National Park Service ranger, and thought of me.

From there it moved the way these things move when people decide not to look away. Judy to me. Me to Paula Palmer. Paula to Frank MedicineWater, the Cheyenne-Arapaho tribal officer tracing these children and their descendants. Frank to Fred Mosqueda of the Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes of Oklahoma, who wrote back that his wife had been raised in part by her grandfather, Gustave Yellowhair.

On July 22, 2024, Fred came from Oklahoma with his wife Mary Fletcher and her brother John. The family did not want Grace disinterred. They came to perform what had never been done, so that her spirit could finally leave. Cedar was burned. Feathers fanned the smoke. Fred sang three songs with his drum. Theodore was remembered in the prayers so that he could go too. We stood in silence to witness. I strongly felt the presence of the Spirit.

Afterward we shared a meal at the meetinghouse. That was part of it too — the last meal Grace would share with her family on earth. They made up a plate for her and set it outside, in a sheltered spot.

It was not the phrase “forced assimilation” that failed to reach me. Those words I had heard. What did not reach me was Grace.
The moveLet one name carry what no summary can.
The trapCollecting names. One that changes you is worth more than a hundred that move past you.
Sit with thisWhose grave is near you?

Movement III — The Correction

I had been using what did not reach us as a way for Friends to get past the words that make people shut down. And it worked.

Then I saw why it worked. It worked because nothing more was being asked.

My friend Sikowis Nobiss, founder of the Great Plains Action Society, has spoken to congregations — Mennonites, Quakers, Catholic Workers — and says that in nearly every one she meets “a cocktail of white guilt combined with a desire to be in proximity to Indigenous folks” that leads only to more inaction. Giving land back, she reminds us, is the single most powerful thing settlers with inherited wealth can do, and almost none of those conversations have ever led to it.

So the phrase needs a second half. It has to be bridged from “what did not reach us” to “and therefore, this.” After we are moved by these stories, what are we being asked to relinquish?

  • Is it land?
  • Is it money?
  • Is it our comfort?
  • Is it the cherished story of our own moral goodness?
The moveTest a phrase by what it costs the person who accepts it.
The trapBeing moved. Being moved is a feeling, and feelings are not obligations.
Sit with thisOf those four, which one made you flinch? That is your answer.

Everything above resolves into three questions, each with its own way of going wrong.

QuestionWhat it asks forIts trap
What did not reach me?The contentCollecting tragic facts as though knowing were the work
Why did it not reach me?The mechanismAbsolution — “not my fault” as a resting place
What am I called to do now?The obligationSkipping here as performance, or never arriving
The passive completed with the active, ending in what you are called to do.
The moveRefuse to stop at question one or question two.
Sit with thisWhich of the three do you keep returning to? Which do you avoid?

This is the distinction the whole path turns on.

Knowledge that is missing is found by study. You didn't know human anatomy; you took the class; now you do.

Knowledge that is withheld cannot be taught in a class. You cannot study your way across a withholding. A withholding is not a gap in the information. It is a break in a relationship. And the only thing that repairs a broken relationship is another relationship — a channel.

Quaker involvement in the Underground Railroad is a story Friends like to tell. What happened in the schools of forced assimilation is not. That story stayed on the other side of a boundary I had never crossed. I had no relationship with the people who carried the memory, and no channel by which it could reach me.

The moveDiagnose which kind of not-knowing you are facing, because they call for different work.
The trapAssigning yourself more reading when what is required is showing up.
Sit with thisIs what you don't know missing, or withheld? How would you tell the difference?

Movement IV — The Language

Passive language is not an accident of style. It is the finished product of the silence.

Iowa was opened to settlement.

Convert it:

The United States forced the Sauk, Meskwaki, and Ioway from Iowa through coerced treaties, and sold their land to settlers — including the families whose farms I grew up among. The land is held under that taking today.

Notice what the conversion requires: an agent (the United States), a mechanism (coerced treaties), the present tense (the land is still held), and the speaker (me, inside the sentence).

A sentence with no agent asks nothing of anyone. A converted sentence ends with someone holding something — and what is held can be returned.

The movePut the agent back. Put yourself back.
The trapTreating this as a writing exercise. It is a property question wearing grammar.
Sit with thisWrite one sentence about your community's history in the passive. Convert it. Notice what you now owe.

I kept using the word we without saying which one I meant. That is how people slip out of an obligation without noticing — they assume they are in a different “we” than the one being addressed.

The “we”What it carries
We who operated the schoolsQuakers institutionally, 1860s–1900s. Named people, named schools, federal arrangements. Yours by inheritance, and it cannot be declined.
We who were taught the benevolent storyNot culpable for the schools. Fully accountable for what we do now that we know.
We who were not reached at ScattergoodStudents and teachers together. Your teachers belong in this “we” with you, not on the other side of it.
We who are Friends todayEvery meeting that owns property. The “we” that can actually be asked for something.
We settlersBroadest, least useful for obligation, necessary for accuracy.
We who walkedThe roughly thirty Native and non-Native people, September 1–8, 2018. Mine to use only because I was there.
We of the HubPeople who show up to the work weeks under Indigenous direction. Includes me, and confers no authorship.
We facing collapseThe only place the pronoun is honestly universal — with the qualification that collapse arrived for Native peoples in the nineteenth century.
The moveBefore you accept or refuse an obligation, find out which “we” is holding it.
The trapChoosing the broadest “we” so that no one in particular is addressed.
Sit with thisIn the sentence “we need to do better,” who exactly is the we? Are you in it?

Movement V — The Turn

Read this one slowlyAt Station 7 I said what did not reach us was the soft phrase and withheld was the honest one. Here I come to the opposite conclusion, and I now believe the opposite is correct. I have left the seam showing on purpose.
If something was withheld, the wrong belongs to whoever withheld it. You are the injured party — owed an apology, owed disclosure. “Withheld” excuses you.

“Did not reach me” does not. If it did not reach you, the obligation is yours: build the channel.

What changed was not the history. What changed was the test. I stopped asking which phrase names the harm most accurately and started asking which phrase leaves someone with work to do this month.

Under the second test, “withheld” fails. It makes every action wait on a confession that is never going to arrive.

And most of what happened in our records was not withholding at all. It was abandonment — thousands of pages sitting unopened in Friends' archives for a century. Nobody lied there. There is no false impression, because there is no statement at all.

No one has to confess before a record can be opened.

That is why a meeting can act this month. Not because the question of guilt has been settled, but because it does not have to be.

The moveChoose your language by what it makes possible, not only by what it names.
The trapUsing “we can act without settling guilt” as a way of never settling it.
Sit with thisIs there something you have been waiting for someone else to admit before you begin?

Any record you find is one of four things, and the classification tells you what work is in front of you.

ClassificationWhat it isWhat it asks of you
RecordedIt is there and it is accurateRead it
Left outAttendance, crop yields, behavior — but not the disease, the abuse, the children's objections, the grief of their familiesResearch what is missing; read what is there against what is not
Never openedKept, catalogued or not, and never read by anyoneSomeone simply has to open it
Opened at lastSomebody finally read itCarry what it says

We do not know what the clerk of a Quaker meeting knew or intended in 1883. Lying means knowing, and we cannot establish knowing. That is precisely why intent is the less useful question.

At my own meeting, historical documents sat in a safe in the meetinghouse that no one could unlock for many years. Recently it was opened — a treasure trove. Those papers were never opened. They are now a chance to be opened at last.

Peter Hoehnle wrote the West Branch paper from sources that had been available the whole time.

The moveClassify before you conclude.
The trapAssuming the record is empty because no one has described it to you.
Sit with thisWhere are your community's records right now? Do you know, or do you only assume someone does?

Here is the end of the path. It is small on purpose. Arriving informed is a form of respect, and every question you can answer through your own records is a question you do not spend on a relationship. There is a saying in oppressed communities: it is not our job to educate you.

Send this.

To the clerk of __________ Friends Meeting,

I am writing to ask three questions about our own records.

1. Where are this meeting's historical records held, and who is responsible for them?

2. Which of them have been cataloged, and which have never been read? I am asking particularly about any material touching Indian boarding schools, Indian affairs committees, or schools operated by Friends.

3. If any of it has never been read, may I read it, and may I report what I find to this meeting?

Then build a channel. Not a visit, not a tour. The first impulse most of us have is to go and look, to treat the work and the people as something to be seen. That impulse is not a fault; it is the only model of learning most of us were ever given. But it is the wrong question.

Not “may I see it?”
but “what is being asked of me, now that I know?”

Why this is written down at all

Knowledge does not transfer by reading. I have said so throughout, and I mean it. So why write?

Because a story can open a door, even though it cannot carry what is on the other side. Stories make people want the encounter that changes them. Desire is portable; experience is not. And the pattern can be transmitted even when the content cannot: find your local silence, show up in your body, and let the story follow.

You cannot walk ninety-four miles down a gravel road with the people I walked with. That is not what is being asked. What is being asked is that you find the boundary nearest to you and begin, slowly and over years, to build one channel across it.

I am also writing because I do not want to hand on the silence I was handed.